automatic integration - systems as designed
the vision at the heart of the method started as a question:
could a user community define a business approach so completely that the IT (computer) department did NOT need to add more intelligence to that definition to build it?
If yes, then production time becomes a matter of seconds. systems are built and deployed in a matter of hours. because then an ontological syntactic builder program can also build those datasets reports, screens and functions.
the provocative next question is: Can users today do that? - the answer, sadly, is not with today's tools.
but I have a toolset that can!!!
Aryc (Alagna Rythms Corp) has developed a set of standards that Automatic Integration ( its wholly owned subsidiary) created our toolset around.
(_) Extended Miller Lists to record datasets, relationships, smart-data-functions
(_) the Alagna Graphic Matrix to record the who,what,when,where,why,how,at-what-cost with what rules, limits, hints and suggestions
(_) BCML (Business Centric Methodology Language) an adaptation of the Oasis standard BML [[i owe you a link here]]
(_) the advanced agent language
(_) BURNE (simultaneous process orchestration platform)
(_) BERTA (process orchestration language)
(_) BASII (open platform open language)
(_) BAIL (as presented) [[i owe you a link here]]
(_) Ontological information stores - database24+ which overcomes the current database limitations.
the modern database model is the tuple(T,C,R,V). Table-Column-Row-Value. but modern database engines limit them to the type of questions that can be asked of the data stored there. an ontological information store starts with a common database and expands (more like explodes!) from there.